Saturday 28 July 2018

Freedom is priceless. This is what Remainers cannot recognise


This is compulsory reading for those who believe in democracy

Why do Remainers find it impossible to consider the possibility that some people were prepared to accept a relatively poorer country as a price worth paying for a more independent one?
When it comes to Brexit – as with Thomas Frank and Kansas – it is widely insisted upon that no one could possibly have voted against their own economic interests knowingly. No one voted to be poorer, Anna Soubry told the Commons in an impassioned speech last week. The argument goes on thus: because Brexit will make us poorer, the Brexit-voting working class cannot have known what they were doing. So either they are stupid or (which amounts to the same thing) easily manipulated by the dark forces of those who do have much to gain.
But what if people did indeed think that there was something about Brexit that was more important that GDP? Why is it impossible to consider that possibility, that some people were indeed prepared to accept a relatively poorer country as a price worth paying for a more independent one? That some things are more important than money?

One of the things that annoys me most is  Remainers like Soubry foaming  at the mouth declaring whatever people voted for they did not vote to be poorer.What they voted for Soubry was freedom a concept our Remainer MPs do not support.  

2 comments:

Niall Warry said...

The tragedy is that the Efta/EEA deal would restore our independence and not involve anyone getting poorer.

rapscallion said...

@Niall Warry It would still however involve uncontrolled movement of people. Moreover didn't we vote to leave the EU, the Single Market, the Customs Union and the ECJ. What is so wrong with going to WTO rules anyway?, the rest of the world does. And yes, I did vote to leave knowing that I might be poorer in the short term, and I DID know what I was voting for.