About 2 years ago pre the 2016 referendum vote I debated in our village hall before a hundred villagers or so with Paddy Ashdown the pros & cons of leaving the EU. One of Paddy's dodgy killer facts was that our Civil Service gold plated and expanded perfectly good concise EU rules. I explained to Paddy that EU rules were so concise because they were so vague and left all decisions up to ECJ judges who see it as their duty to support the EU commission's decisions.. Our tradition is to draft legislation tightly to make our parliament and law superior to judge law.
It is now clear that Mrs May and her controller Oily will sign up to a vague meaningless common rule book that will require frequent references to the ECJ for interpretation which will of course always favour the EU Commission's view and keep us locked into the EU but enable Mrs May to claim she is respecting the result of our referendum.These frequent references to the ECJ, will take much time in the true Mrs May pattern and of course only the ECJ will be able to rule on such matters.
How can we escape from this smothering plan? Not under this PM whose plan this of course is., We need a different PM who will implement the spirit as well as the letter of Brexit ho . Let us hope it will be cometh the hour cometh the man who can free us from the EU's web.
2 comments:
Bouncy baps
I always thought that this was the flaw with a referendum. I voted leave and in many ways I regret it, as leaving without a leave Government is pointless, worse than nothing.
Post a Comment