Monday, 25 October 2010

Farage, the Tory/BBC establishment stooge

I was very struck by the posting of a Mike Natrass letter on Butcher's forum today,

Dear All,

It may be too late but after all these years I can no longer stay silent.

In the previous Leadership Election I, together with all candidates EXCEPT LORD PEARSON were rubbished by Nigel Farage on TV and elsewhere. This ensured the election of Nigel's puppet Lord Pearson and allowed Nigel to continue to be the face of the party. That is Nigel's view of the election rules and I think it is only fair and high time that his methods were exposed, USING HIS OWN RULES.

Nigel already Leads the parliamentary Group and when he is also elected Leader this will amount to total control. Increasingly I am hearing the word "Spiv" used to describe him, from people who are not members but see his image. I am concerned that the UKIP party brand will be tarnished, even holed below the water line, by his monopoly of power.

Whilst Nigel is a very good speaker, he is also a control freak. He grabs all UKIP publicity to the detriment of any other UKIP spokesperson or MEP. He employs assistants with the MEP's budgets without allowing those MEPs any say. This, despite the fact that UKIP MEPs demanded a chance to interview those who were being employed with their money. Nigel agreed, then totally ignored that promise. Consequently he has his own "group funded" team around him and all "hiring" takes place via his close friend Godfrey Bloom MEP (this person is said to be banned by 4 hotels for urinating in the corridors)

Nigel's lack of experience in good staff management and his refusal to allow MEP consultation is complimented by the morals of an Alley Cat (and I will not go there). I have always said that this does not matter, because so long as we are all in the trench together with guns pointing at the enemy all are welcome. But he shot Nikki Sinclaire in the back when she became an MEP, for no Party reason, while she was giving all the effort she could give. She was expelled as a UKIP MEP for pointing out the Group facts. He does not like truth or competition.

I have put a lot of money, time and energy into promoting UKIP in the West Midlands and I watched it wrecked at the General Election by Nigel's chosen people (Lords Pearson and Monckton) who appeared from nowhere and failed to understand our basic strategy or even comprehend from where our votes are derived. Worse, Nikki, who has vast energy at election time, was stopped from being a UKIP MEP by Nigel and has not been given a chance to defend herself or to state her case (legal matters are pending). She and I were told by Lord Pearson not to get involved in the election and not to fund the campaign. In fact you will see that we both made considerable financial contributions but our campaign was deeply damaged. Also the subsequent enquiry into the campaign, requested by the WM candidates, was "dealt with" by Monckton (who thought I was behind it) and because of this we have had resignations from very keen activists.

All this West Midlands destruction because Nigel hates Nikki and wants to rubbish me!! Do you know how much money Nigel has contributed to this to nothing.

I found allegations of fraud were brought against me when I stood for Leadership. These were in the Sunday Times. They melted away afterwards and had no foundation in truth, but they did the job intended.(My legal case against the Times is pending) Nigel has had a number of very real cases against him.. funny how that word does not get out.

My first major annoyance with Nigel's manipulations stem from the time when I was first elected in 2004 and all UKIP MEPs had a meeting to agree three very basic points. One was that we could not employ wives (other Parties did) and this was agreed. In fact my wife comes to each Parliament and does not get paid (not even travel expenses) and I said that she wanted to contribute any proper payment to the Party, but no, rules were rules and she could be paid nothing. It was then later exposed that Nigel's wife was being secretly paid out of his budget, breaking this rule. He did not seek any permission (to change his own rule) from the MEPs. He was simply "caught out" with both hands in the till. I fear that the whole Parliamentary Group in the EU is run for Nigel's financial and public image. I left that ugly group.

Nigel has derailed every leader since the very first, except peacemaker Jeffery Titford (under whom I was Party Chairman). He is therefore hated by them all (except JT). plus never to be leader Kilroy Silk who must feel that Nigel gave him a wrong prospectus.

I expect that Nigel will be elected leader as no one else is effectively allowed to stand without a spin campaign against them. I can see less MEPs in the UKIP squad when he does win.

There is a false attack on Tim Congdon from Boggers 4 UKIP, this must mean he is a real threat! Good.



One of the moderators followed it up with the statement below which summarises what Del, David and I conclude about NF two years ago - he is nothing more than a very useful  establishment stooge.

"To be treated so well by the media NF must be part of the Establishment. An Establishment that wants us to be a member of the EU.

Whilst he is in charge of an ineffective and largest anti EU party, which attracts most of the anti EU vote - the Establishment have no fear that this vote will be consolidated in one determined party, which could threaten our membership."

Exactly. If you look on Butchers forum, click on link, you will see there was an immediate effort by two Farage sycophants, D Denny and a nonentity called BvL to immediately get this thread of topic. Even Tony Butcher, a man who has sat on every fence ever erected posted,

"NF's days are surely numbered; there are only so many people he can smear and discount before the remaining activists realise that he is entirely unsuitable to be a party leader, a leader of the MEPs or even to hold public office."

Everyone who has ever had any dealings with NF will atest to the truth of what Mike Natrass writes and Tony Butcher's conclusion.

M3 however poses the right question. The answer is, as M3 knows, NF is very useful to the Tory and BBC pro EU establishment. As long as NF remains UKIP leader no serious person will take leaving the EU seriously. NF is the performing monkey but the organ grinder is the Tory and BBC Establishmemt. As long as he is there posturing on QT etc which the BBC are quite happy with as he promotes their fruit  cakes and loonies agenda image of UKIP. And Yes he does it very well and the EU is very pleased with Mr Farage.

Farage as MN points out has blocked every serious attempt at EU opposition within UKIP with the result that Daniel Hanaan, a Tory, is the leading anti EU spokesman. He is a far better orator than NF as his speeches address each point as it arises. Once you have heard on Farage speech you have heard them all. To coin a phrase you cannot put a cigarette paper between any of them!

If Farage wins on 5th Nov UKIP is finished and I fear the BNP and EDL will step into fill the vacuum that will be created by Farage's increasingly and irrelevant media performances.

No comments: